I had a running revelation the other day. I have running revelations quite often, I don’t run far or fast, but there’s something about the time outside, the concentration that isn’t on work or anything but the next step, and the silence – I tend not to listen to anything while I run, mindfulness stuff/philosophy podcasts sometimes – that means new thoughts come to me when I run.
This was my new thought. Some of the suffering I have felt, and sometimes still feel, about infertility and failed IVFs and the ongoing life of childlessness not-by-choice, is self-inflicted because I too have bought into the prevalent idea that I am not a fully-rounded human being because I am not a parent, because I too have bought into the idea that mother-love/father-love/parent-love is special and different and it changes everything. Because I too have bought into the prevailing, everywhere, constant and never-ending belief in our society that until we are human beings that have procreated other human beings we are not fully actualised humans.
Parents say this stuff all the time – “I never felt love like this until I held my baby”, “having my child changed everything”, “I didn’t know love until I had a child”. And I trust that these things are true for the people who are saying them. When I hear them, however, I cannot help but feel left out, that they are speaking of something I will never know, an intrinsically human thing I’ll never get to experience. It is a very common human thing to be a parent* and I don’t get to have those feelings. Ever.
So I knew that I felt sympathy or (shudder) pity from those who love me because I don’t get to have this very human experience. What I hadn’t quite taken in was that I have also been doing it to myself. Constantly hearing the sentiments from the world that tell me I’m not a real woman because I’m not a mother, not a fully-realised human being because I’m not a parent, and internalising them, so that – on some level – I believe them myself, even though I don’t want to and nor do I think they’re right. And yet, I know that somehow, I too have taken in these ideas. Like internalised homophobia, it’s a hard thing to see about ourselves. And now I’ve seen it for part of the nuclear family lie that it is. The same lie that tells us two parents are always better than one. That a family needs a mother and father. That families are always based on a heterosexual coupling. That we are only families if we have children, or parents, or have just two generations in one home, whatever other mid-20th-century nuclear family cliche we’ve bought into.
Seeing it means I can not only question, as I do when I hear those sentiments expressed by others**, it also means I can question those sentiments when I find myself buying into them. I can notice that part of the hurt I feel is that I too have bought the world’s lie that my life is not of value unless I procreate. It’s tough to notice where we’ve been damaging ourselves, in addition to the world causing us pain, but it’s useful. There’s not much I can do about the world – though I try! – but there’s a lot I can do about me.
* it’s also a very common human thing to die, and I’ve had a life-threatening illness twice more than many people. I appreciate that fewer people want my life-changing experience than want the life-changing experience of parenthood.
** because honestly, when someone says they never felt self-less love before they had a child, I really wonder what they were feeling for other people who needed them and how they managed to be so self-centred until they had children.
At the risk of seeming crass, and I know it’s one of the responses you have said that irritate you, but I never wanted children. In my case because my suffering took the form of dysfunctional parenting and sexual abuse and I didn’t want to expose another human to it. However I am fairly sure my sublimated version of child love has been expressed to my animals, in particular an old rescue dog who needed me so badly and loved me so much. I cannot believe I could have loved a child more than that old chap. Loving is finding a focus for giving with all your heart, and I don’t believe children are the the sole, though normalised, focus for giving love that is possible..
LikeLike
oh I don’t think that’s crass at all, and I totally appreciate the experience of people who didn’t want children is different-but-similar. Thank you for adding.
LikeLike
I have never wanted children, ever. I have no maternal instincts whatsoever. I am 40 next year and I have no regrets about my decisions. However, I do agree with you, at some level I seem to have internalised this thing of you are not a real woman if you don’t have kids. Every advert I see with women my age in it – they have kids, very few women on my age without kids on TV, I do feel like I am a subcatagory which doesn’t have anything marketed at it, which quite frankly in today’s society means you don’t exist.
All of my friends have kids, which of course changes the dynamics of the relationship and what we talk about…I dont’ have anyone to talk to about what it is like to be this age and not have kids.
It’s all very strange
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jen. Jody Day of Gateway Women shared a great phrase for it – ‘pronatal privilege’. And like ‘white privilege’ you can imagine the phrase ruffles a few feathers! I think it’s very real though. And mostly assumed (like white privilege) to be the status quo, rather than a learned bias.
LikeLike
I haven’t heard of that, but yes, it is the status quo, completely and utterly
LikeLike
I don’t know about feeling like a woman. Giving birth made me feel like a poor desperate animal – and no glamorous predator either, a bellowing sweatinf ruminant. Holding a new born child is amazing, that’s true – that you both survived, mostly. It’s followed by the shock that this creature is utterly dependent on you. It really is instinct after that for both of you. You could argue that unless you’ve breasted your child you can never ‘feel like a woman’. Lord, no one is arguing that one, are they? I never felt more womanly for having children, more motherly perhaps but you can feel that with other people’s children. I happen to like kids generally. Children entertain and move me. They are, of course, the future but there are many ways to make their future better. In fact, we rely just as much on those who don’t have children to do that. I was lucky to have help with my own family from my wider family, friends and paid helpers, mostly women but men too. The ‘nuclear’ family is a hard thing to make work. That I think you would have been a great mother of your own children goes without saying. You have the essential compassion, practical nature and leadership. (Yes, you need leadership!) I reckon the world is the poorer without Duffy/Silas progeny, but imho, you have both managed to spread the love you had to give and for that I thank you. Xx
LikeLike
It’s absolutely vital to unearth this conditioning in our own consciousness in order to be free of the sense that our life is some kind of ‘second best’ as women without children, particularly if that wasn’t our choice. Pronatalist conditioning is a powerful form of sexism that positions childless women as either cruel (childfree) or deranged/destroyed (childless) and is supported everywhere in the culture – from Snow White’s Evil Stepmother (childfree), Cruela de Vil (childfree), Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction (Childless) through the recent Girl on a Train (failed IVF, childless, alcoholic). Unrooting and pushing back internalised pronatalism, like internalised homophobia, is the work of emotional warriors. Thank you for this piece. Hugs, Jody x
LikeLiked by 3 people
thank you DD, and oh, imagine those Duffy/Silas genes joined up! xx
LikeLike
oh yes Jody, the paces where we see ourselves reflected back as ALWAYS bad/wicked/wrong/lacking. It is hugely comparable to the narrative of homophobia. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just had an intelligent thought tonthis discussion but since I‘m in a train car full of screaming toddlers it has disappeared again. I‘ll let you know when it comes back.
LikeLike
ah it came back.
I also had a revelation recently (though I don’t run). I suddenly saw myself as a descendant in a big family tree of childless people. Which sounds weitd at first because obviously people need to have procreated to ultimately have produced the two people who together finally produced me. But what I mean is I suddenly realized that all our family trees back through the generations are full of childless men and women. All those siblings and cousins who did NOT get martied. They are in my family tree and therefore also my ancestors. And that means I get to be an ancestor of future generations . Even if it’s my mother‘s brother‘s kids from his third marriage who are a generation younger than me and whom I hardly know. I’m somewhere there in their family tree and part of their ancestry.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like this thought Elena, my buddhist practice teaches that when we chant we are also chanting for our families seven generations back and seven forward, we’re all connected, be it through direct descent or not. and yes, the remembering those childless people before us is also important- we’ve always been here! thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oddly Elena, I also have a statistically aberrant number of forbears who chose to remain single and have no children so perhaps the total lack of desire for children was in my genes. No consolation if you wanted them and didn’t have them of course, and for all I know they may all have wished their lives had been different.
In the Buddhist way of thinking, I’m playing the hand I was given and that’s fine. No regrets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A great blog, wich is tough and powerful in the same time. The idea of grief as self inflicted idea is very difficult to accept, but it is true. Even though we have this great places to meditate about it, and having clear this fact, outside the world seems to be focused on nuclear family. Everyday we are bombarded with pubblicity that defines happiness with couples with children, grand parents and their grand children cooking, vacations, cars, houses that become home. I have the crazy idea that economy is based in nuclear family and is natural that they focus in their public.That definitively does not help in my search of peace, but I am triying to look in another angle. Running helps a lot!
LikeLike
thanks Gabriela, and I agree – any physical work helps. I don’t really think that grief is ‘self inflicted’ – it’s part of the pain we cannot do without in life. I do though, think that our own internalised notions can be part of exacerbating our grief, and that’s where our own understanding of being part of a very heteronormalised world can help.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The final footnote really resonates with me – I do wonder at those who say they’ve never felt a love like it when they have a child as it makes me wonder where their capacity to love selflessly was previously (and what that means for the relationship that produced said child!).
I need to remind myself constantly that, despite all appearances, being a parent is not the status quo and there are many people of child bearing age and older it does not apply to but it is something I find myself having to constantly work at.
LikeLike
thanks Cathryn. I think we all have to work at not othering those who are not what the mainstream world thinks is the norm. I’m always grateful when people are more inclusive around the places (queer, childless, chronic pain) where my life doesn’t fit the ‘standard’.
LikeLike
Great thought piece. The bit that compelled me to comment is your last **, where you say “…when someone says they never felt self-less love before they had a child, I really wonder what they were feeling for other people who needed them and how they managed to be so self-centred until they had children.”
I remember once taking my daughter to a play date at a friend’s house and another woman who I had never met before was there with her children too. She said she was ashamed to say that before her own children she had a been hospital mid-wife and would tell the mothers to stop overreacting about their pain etc. I didn’t say anything because I was in shock. I couldn’t comprehend that a person refused to believe the women after women after women having the same experience until she had it herself. I wondered why on earth she had become a midwife if she couldn’t be compassionate. In fact, I have many friends who’ve had doubtful experiences with midwives who were cold and dispassionate. Why do they need to become parents themselves in order to go ‘Oh, I could have been kinder.?’ What did their training/upbringing/personality consist of!!?
One of the best unsung books written about women’s relationships is “mother daughter revolution” in which they say that every woman is a ‘mother’ in the sense that our contributions to society in every shape or form supports the next generation whether as a work mentor, an auntie, a kind act in the street etc. (authors: Elizabeth Debold, Marie Wilson, Idelisse Malave). In that regard, every man is a ‘father’ too. Every generation supports and raises the next generation – whatever our role.
LikeLike
thank you Nic. yes, it sometimes astounds me that there seems to be a human need to go through something personally before we can believe how it feels for others.
LikeLike
I have two children whom I love with all my heart, and I love being a mother. Yet I have always felt it to be an invitation to extend a capacity for love, not exclusive in itself. I would honestly say I love many other people as much as I love the (not ‘my’, not ‘our’) girls. There are so many ways to love, and this idea of competition or exclusivity in love is as mistaken as it is in every other arena. To love whole-heartedly has no object.
LikeLike
thank you Jennifer, and I agree that to love whole-heartedly is the core.
LikeLike